Animal Advocates Watchdog

Are these the actions of an animal welfarist or an animal controller?

Is killing dogs the way that old dog in North Vancouver was killed twenty years ago, and Maggie was killed last week, the actions of an animal welfarist or an animal controller? The answer, in my opinion, is animal controller. I don't know of any real animal welfarist who would have made the decision that the manager of the Williams Lake SPCA made. It is ludicrous to suggest that killing Maggie could be the most humane decision when real humane options were available.

The killing of Maggie once again raises serious concerns about the practices and policies of the BC SPCA.

Should an animal controller, who authorized the killing of a dog because it shakes, be working at a so-called animal welfare society?

How many other people are working at SPCAs who kill that easily?

Lack of training, or training in animal control and disposal rather than animal welfare, the hiring of people who accept the job of animal control and disposal, and the firing of staff who put welfare before control, has been a concern of real animal welfarists and many members of the public for as long as AAS has been doing animal welfare - 20 years. We have documented this same concern going back 50 years.

Messages In This Thread

SPCA had dog destroyed before owners could claim her
Maggie's owner tells her side of this story *LINK*
I have had way too many encounters with the SPCA where the animal was treated just the opposite of what the SPCA stands for
Even after six months on the job, SPCA Manager didn't know the basic 96 hours rule *LINK* *PIC*
It is 2009, and the SPCA is only now thinking that a Communications Book should be in place?
This practice may be more prevalent than the public realizes
Are these the actions of an animal welfarist or an animal controller?
Is "shaking" on the SPCA's list of reasons it can kill an animal while still claiming not to kill any "adoptable" animals

Share